Every month it feels like a new standalone VR headset is coming to the market, which can make choosing one extremely difficult.
We have the unique opportunity to test numerous VR headsets every month, and through our testing, we have narrowed it down to 15 VR headsets that you should consider and awarded some with titles like ‘the best overall standalone VR headset’ and ‘the most feature rich’. So you can jump to whatever category you find most interesting.
Pros | Cons |
Great value, cheaper than Quest 2 | No headphones Jack |
4K+ resolution | Wired streaming is not user-friendly |
Superior comfort | |
Small and lightweight from the new pancake lens | |
RGB passthrough for mixed reality | |
Immersive 105° field of view | |
User-friendly automatic IPD |
The Pico 4 VR headset is hands down the best standalone and all-in-one VR headset. For €429, you get an industry-leading battery life, the new pancake lens for improved visual clarity, small size, feathery weight, and a 4K+ crispy resolution in an immersive 105° FoV.
PicoXR came out swinging in late September 2022 with Pico 4 and Pico 4 Enterprise. As we concluded in our Pico 4 review, “Pico 4 delivers a substantially better visual performance with higher pixels per inch, a wider and immersive field of view, superior comfort, and best of all, at a lower price than Oculus Quest 2 / Meta Quest 2… the new Pico 4 is ready to take the mantle from the once untouchable Meta Quest 2.”
Display | Dual LCD |
Resolution | 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye |
Lens | Pancake |
Field of View | 105 degrees |
Refresh rate | 72-90Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 5 integrated cameras with hand tracking and mixed reality |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 |
Price | €499 (256 GB) |
Pros | Cons |
Loads of accessories available | Not future proof |
Massive VR gaming library | No dynamic foveated rendering |
Continuous updates with new features | No Bluetooth headphone support |
Still affordable | Short battery life |
No more Facebook account requirement | Requires accessory for better comfort |
Blistering 120Hz refresh rate |
Despite its price increase, Meta Quest 2 is still one the best VR headset for virtual reality gaming. It is the most popular, which means a massive VR games library and incredible customizability with plenty of available accessories.
Oculus Quest 2 is the best standalone virtual reality headset for VR gaming, and the reasons are that Meta updates its VR headsets continually, bringing new features to the headset. Lastly, its popularity means game developers always will release their games for the headset, making its gaming content for the Meta Quest 2 plentiful.
Display | Single LCD |
Resolution | 1832 x 1920 pixels per eye |
Lens | Fresnel |
Field of View | 90 degrees |
Refresh rate | 90-120Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 4 tracking cameras with hand tracking |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 |
Price | €549 (256 GB) |
Pros | Cons |
Impressive tracking features | Expensive |
New Snapdragon XR2+ processor | Only 1-2 hours of battery life |
12GB of the fastest RAM | The resolution should be higher |
Continuous Meta support with updates and new features | For now, its mixed reality could be better |
Dual-camera video passthrough | Not automatic IPD |
AI-enabled body tracking | |
Excellent build quality |
The Meta Quest Pro VR headset went above and beyond with extensive tracking features, with hand, face, and eye tracking, even AI-enabled body tracking. It is the first VR headset to feature the new Snapdragon XR2+ chipset. On paper, this VR headset is excellent. However, the Meta Quest Pro is expensive and is lacking in areas like battery life.
Meta set out to develop the best standalone VR headset, and in many ways, they succeeded. The Meta Quest Pro will push the boundaries of mixed reality run by its capable processing, like the newest Snapdragon XR2+ processor, and 12GB of the fastest RAM. While the Quest Pro has a limited resolution count compared to other headsets, the Quantum Dot display technology from Samsung makes the visuals pop. Yes, the Meta Quest Pro has a reduced battery life and a lofty price tag: the number of features in this VR headset is costly and power-hungry.
Display | Dual LCD with Quantum Dot and Local Dimming |
Resolution | 1800 x 1920 pixels per eye |
Lens | Pancake |
Field of View | 106 degrees |
Refresh rate | 72-90Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 10 tracking cameras with eye, hand, and face tracking |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2+ |
Price | €1799.99 |
Pros | Cons |
Secure privacy and data protection | Limited FoV in virtual reality |
Great open design for mixed reality | The resolution could be higher |
Affordable from crowdfunding | |
Solid MR 3D object occlusion and stability | |
Unique lens technology | |
WiFi 6 connectivity | |
Good battery life | |
Great hand tracking from Ultraleap |
Lynx R1 and Lynx R1 Pro are crowdfunded mixed reality headsets with excellent real-time image processing. Lynx R1’s IR sensors and 3D object stability, combined with its reasonable price, make the R1’s mixed reality better than rivaling MR headsets.
Despite that we only have had limited testing with the crowdfunded Lynx R1 and Lynx R1 Pro, we can safely say the VR headset’s mixed reality and full-color video passthrough with its white balance and contrast optimization is the best for its low cost. There is minimal 3D object jitter with impressive object occlusion, and the open design blends the mixed reality experience perfectly.
In short, the best mixed reality headset is Lynx R1. Yet, numerous MR headsets are about to launch in 2023, like ThinkReality VRX and HTC’s Vive XR Elite, so it will be interesting to see if the conclusion changes.
Display | Dual LCD |
Resolution | 1600 x 1600 pixels per eye |
Lens | Catadioptric freeform prism |
Field of View | 90 degrees |
Refresh rate | 90Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 2 optical tracking cameras and 2 IR sensors with hand tracking from Ultraleap |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 |
Price | $849.00 |
Pros | Cons |
Unique design | Must be tethered to a smartphone |
Great price | Can only run casual VR applications |
6DoF tracking | |
incredibly lightweight |
HTC Vive Flow was the first VR headset to feature the now industry-standard pancake lens. And despite its requirement for being tethered to a smartphone, the VR headset is excellent. It is stylish, has a form factor like glasses, 6DoF tracking, and an incredibly lightweight. Simply, the HTC Vive Flow is the best casual VR headset.
Lastly, the low price for the HTC Vive Flow means the VR headset is ideal for activities like meditation and media consumption.
Display | Dual LCD |
Resolution | 1600 x 1600 pixels per eye |
Lens | Pancake |
Field of View | 100 degrees diagonal |
Refresh rate | 75Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 2 tracking cameras |
Processor | Tethered to a smartphone |
Price | €569 |
Pros | Cons |
Most affordable VR headset | Limited processing capabilities |
Excellent display experience | |
Can be fully operated from the headset | |
User-friendly | |
Movie length battery life |
The standalone VR headset to watch media and have a theater experience from your living room or airplane seat is Pico G2 4K. If all you need a VR headset for is entertainment, this VR headset delivers the best experience compared to its price tag.
The Pico G2 4 K’s most convenient feature is that it can be controlled fully from the headset itself, alleviating the need for a controller.
Lastly, the VR headset’s weight of 278 grams and balanced comfort means watching movies for many hours doesn’t become uncomfortable.
Display | LCD |
Resolution | 1920 x 2160 pixels per eye |
Lens | Pancake |
Field of View | 101 degrees diagonal |
Refresh rate | 75Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 3DoF |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 |
Price | €299 or rent from €40 |
Pros | Cons |
Wider FoV than Meta / Oculus Quest 2 | The resolution could be higher |
Excellent price | |
Option for eye tracking with Pico Neo 3 Pro | |
A good amount of storage for VR games |
As an alternative to Meta / Oculus Quest 2, Pico Neo 3 Pro is excellent. While both standalone VR headsets are comparable, the Neo 3 Pro has a 10% wider field of view.
Similarly, Pico Neo 3 Pro Eye is slightly more expensive than the Quest 2 but features eye tracking, which future proofs it through dynamic foveated rendering. A resolution technology that vastly increases graphical performance.
Display | LCD |
Resolution | 3664 x 1920 pixels per eye |
Lens | Fresnel |
Field of View | 98 degrees |
Refresh rate | 72-90Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 4 tracking cameras (Pico Neo 3 Pro Eye for eye tracking) |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 |
Price | €599 |
Pros | Cons |
High 5K resolution | Expensive |
Ultra-wide field of view | Fan noise can get loud |
Ventilation system for increased performance | Cumbersome IPD adjustment |
The HTC Vive Focus 3 is the standalone VR headset to choose if you want the middle sibling between Meta Quest Pro and Pico 4. While the Vive Focus 3 doesn’t have mixed reality, it features a crisp 2448×2448 pixels per eye resolution and an encompassing 120 degrees FoV.
Additionally, the unique addition of a built-in fan system to cool down the Snapdragon XR2 chipset means the processor can be pushed harder and produce better frame rates in VR games. As a downside, when the fan kicks in, the noise can get distracting, but with a good pair of Bluetooth headphones, you can’t hear the blowing. Lastly, the inclusion of a MicroSD slot with up to 2TB of extra storage is staggering and lets you forget about ever doing storage maintenance again.
Display | Dual LCD |
Resolution | 2448 x 2448 pixels per eye |
Lens | Dual-element Fresnel |
Field of View | 120 degrees |
Refresh rate | 90Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF from 4 tracking cameras with hand tracking |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 |
Price | €1.249 |
Pros | Cons |
Quality AMOLED display | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 |
3K resolution | 4GB RAM |
3 hours of battery life | |
Viveport subscription |
An affordable alternative to the HTC Vive Focus 3 is HTC Vive Focus Plus, with a 3K resolution beamed from an AMOLED display. This display type is one of the best for virtual reality, delivering the widest contrast levels, pixel transformation, and energy saving.
Unfortunately, the Focus Plus uses the dated Snapdragon 835 processor, meaning you can’t play VR games with the highest graphical settings.
Making up for that is the 3-hour battery life after just 30 minutes of charging, and the Viveport subscription is a wonderful way of discovering new VR games, content, and applications.
Display | Dual AMOLED |
Resolution | 1440 x 1600 pixels per eye |
Lens | Fresnel |
Field of View | 110 degrees |
Refresh rate | 75Hz |
Tracking | Inside-Out 6DoF with hand tracking |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 |
Price | Discontinued, find a reseller |